Displaying 1 to 9 (of 9 reviews)

Result Pages:  1 

  • 9 of 13 found this helpful.
    Not better or worse then the Neve 3309

    by R. Masters . 3 out of 5 stars

    I'm not going to buy this compressor because I already have the Neve 3309. Did a A&B and I was able to achieve the same results with the neve 3309. How many compressors do we need by the way? If you already have the 3309 there's no need for this comp. Very subtle differences between the Neve 3309, but not better or worse. I would say the both of them are equivalent.

    Try and A&B the Neve 3309 next to this. Then ask your self if you should blow $300 on another compressor.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 4 of 6 found this helpful.
    Another Disappointment

    by K. Richards . 3 out of 5 stars

    Whats going on here?! What happened to the great emulations that you guys are known for?! Even in the demo it doesn't sound like the hardware. Very Disappointing....


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 6 of 9 found this helpful.
    surprised

    by J. Miguel De Lellis Giurfa . 3 out of 5 stars

    I am surprised here. I do not have the hardware but ... from the video UA post comparing hardware and software ... by no means they sound the same. It is too obvious!! I mean with that comparison you could trick someone with untrained ears ... but not a decent set of ears. How can UA claim they sound the same. I am surprised here, very surprised because that is a bad indication of quality ... UA has to clear this mess up, they cannot make such claims and then show clearly they are not true. The plug-in is great, but I don´t buy UA just for a great plugin, I buy UA to get the best there is ... and this is not it.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 2 of 3 found this helpful.
    the A / B comparison doesn't sound the same..

    by N. PARFITT . 3 out of 5 stars

    The tone is completely different on the plugin version. The hardware example sounds better immediately... even on a the web video.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 5 of 8 found this helpful.
    Well presented, sound not quite there, expensive.

    by P. Lemos . 3 out of 5 stars

    This compressor sounds so different to the original that I can hear it on my iMac speakers - not a good sign. It is for this reason that I find it too expensive. I don't mind paying a premium when I know I am getting "the authentic sound of analog" or "the world's finest analog hardware emulation". Take that away and I start wondering what I am getting this for. I hope that UA will improve on it in further releases.

    Meanwhile, it is still worth something as it does have a pleasant effect on the mix, albeit grainier than the hardware, and the UI is good.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 1 of 2 found this helpful.
    Shadow Hills Mastering Compressor

    by G. Bucci . 3 out of 5 stars

    The hardware does sound better than the plug in. With that being said, does the Shadow Hills plug in improve the overall sound of your mixes? If used right, the answer is a clear yes. The presets offer great options to start with, and then you can fine tune things. The opto can generally smooth things a little while the 2nd comp adds some punch. At the mastering stage I like a compressor that can gently control the transients while still letting the music breathe. I use the Samplitude Ammuntion opto compressor plug in for mastering which I love. It offers more control over the Shadow Hills opto comp. However the dual comp Shadow can do some things the Ammuntion cannot. The Shadow Hills won't replace Amm, but it can be a second tool to use.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 1 of 2 found this helpful.
    SH Mastering Compressor

    by E. Biagini . 3 out of 5 stars

    Niece piece. Sounds musical and transparent. Nice-Good to have to have. Very openly speaking, the look is more amazing than the sound. Overall, too expensive in my opinion.


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 1 of 2 found this helpful.
    My take in this guy

    by J. Chaney . 3 out of 5 stars

    I demo'd it on a live kit i recorded recently, i tested all settings, it seems as if your not going to get anything too magical here, Just a subtle sweeting. it not an artistic statement kind of compression. But for what it does in the subtle since is very nice, sometime thats all you need. most of the time in fact. But yeah not a big wow factor here. Maybe that's why its considered mastering compressor.

    In a strange way it sort of reminds me of Bomb Factory's Fairchild plugin

    Also this video will tell you a lot as well. minus the hype, take a gut level listen.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeAieR536yU


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!
  • 2 of 4 found this helpful.
    As all in their own way VERY USABLE!

    by L. Kruijssen . 3 out of 5 stars

    Owning plenty of UAD plug-ins using them each extensively on each project I wanted this time to contribute with a little more than just words.

    No saturation prior fooling whatsoever http://youtu.be/xTAf9gs4XjI

    Does it sound 100% like the original hardware? I don't own this specific piece of hardware, nor have I ever used it but based on the official promotion video from UA itself I clearly say no and agree there. The hardware briefly heard contains an overall different response within the lows to it, more depth, openness and for that has also accordingly a clear price tag to it. The mid and highs coming way closer, from a mix perspective yes great bang for buck. All known!

    Than is for these reasons this plug-in not useful? Hell no!


    Was this review helpful?
    NO!YES!

Displaying 1 to 9 (of 9 reviews)

Result Pages:  1